The occasional, often ill-considered thoughts of a Roman Catholic permanent deacon who is ever grateful to God for his existence. Despite the strangeness we encounter in this life, all the suffering we witness and endure, being is good, so good I am sometimes unable to contain my joy. Deo gratias!


Although I am an ordained deacon of the Catholic Church, the opinions expressed in this blog are my personal opinions. In offering these personal opinions I am not acting as a representative of the Church or any Church organization.

Showing posts with label old age. Show all posts
Showing posts with label old age. Show all posts

Monday, October 25, 2021

Is Older Better?

It’s an interesting question, and I suppose the only acceptable answer is, “It depends.” So often we assume that with age comes wisdom. Have you ever noticed how centenarians respond when asked to reveal the secret of their longevity? Their answers vary widely, but only rarely display signs of wisdom. I’ve heard everything from “coffee and grits every morning” to “a glass of whiskey every night.” I’ve never heard anybody say, “I really didn’t do anything special. I suppose I was blessed and have good genes.” This would probably be the most honest response, one that likely reflects true humanity and some degree of scientific validity.

My dad used to say, “Yes, indeed, some older people are truly wise and have gained wisdom through a lifetime of both education and experience. But I’ve also known a lot of stupid, old jerks.” As someone who is now, at age 77, in the midst of my seniority, I agree with my dad’s observation, although into which category I fall has yet to be determined. I’m sure most of us can agree, when it comes to people, wisdom is likely distributed sparsely but randomly among most age groups, with the possible exception of teenagers.

As for lifespans, God has allotted His human creatures a reasonable number of years. How did the psalmist put it?

For all our days pass away under thy wrath,
our years come to an end like a sigh.
The years of our life are threescore and ten,
or even by reason of strength fourscore;
yet their span is but toil and trouble;
they are soon gone, and we fly away [Ps 90:9-10].

I’ve always liked that “fly away” metaphor, and as someone who is well past this biblical span, I expect I’ll be boarding that flight and departing all this toil and trouble in the not too distant future. But until that final sigh I’ll just continue doing what I trust God wills for me.

The average healthy person might make it into the 80s or 90s, but such lifespans are negligible when we look at others of God’s creations. The longest-lived of all living creatures, however, are plants. Among the oldest are trees, particularly those categorized as “clonal colonies.” Some of these date back many thousands of years to some original plant of which they are descendant clones. I’m sorry, but I don’t consider these natural clones individually ancient. When it comes to old plants, I want to know about a tree or some other plant that is itself very, very old. There are a few. Among the oldest — and as you might expect there’s a lot of controversy surrounding these claims — is a tree rooted in California, a 5,000-year-old Great Basin bristlecone pine. It’s truly an interesting looking tree, although it’s small size belies it’s extreme age. (See the photo below.)



California’s Bristlecone Pine

If you’re interested in reading about others among these aged plants, here’s a link: Oldest Living Things

As for animals, a long life is probably the result of genetic advantages aided by a kind of learned and instinctive wisdom. A long-lived animal in the wild has likely learned how to survive any number of perils that could have taken its life in a literal heartbeat. Others, perhaps, enjoy rather sedentary lives in a relatively protective environment. If they survive the threats of their first years, some species often live quite long lives. Giant tortoises, for example, are known to live upwards of 200 years, making them the longest living land animals. I don’t believe they’re particularly active creatures and I know nothing of their intelligence, but they look wise enough as they plod along quietly munching vegetation.

Ancient Tortoise

I once read of a Macaw 🦜 that outlived three generations of owners. A man in his sixties purchased the newly hatched bird from a pet shop. Although the man died just a few years later, he willed the bird to his daughter, a wife and mother in her 40s. When she died 30 years later, the bird, at the age of 35, was adopted by her eldest son, who by then was in his 50s. He, too, died in his 70s, and by then the bird was only a middle-aged 56. The family decided to donate the bird to a local zoo where he still lives today in his early 70s. I guess there’s a lesson here: If you want a Macaw as a pet, get it when you’re young.  

There are many other long-lived animals. Elephants often survive into their 70s, but the longest lived creatures tend to make their homes in the ocean. Like those old tortoises, bowhead whales can live to be 200. And a Japanese koi named Hanako died a few years ago at the ripe old age of 226. Greenland sharks can swim around for hundreds of years, some thought to live past 500, making them the longest-lived vertebrate. It must be the cold water and the seafood diet. Presumably, though, these sharks don’t eat ocean quahogs, a nice edible clam that is also known to live to be 500. 


Greenland Shark

 Most animals, though, have relatively short lives. I often think of the dogs that have joined our family. As a child I grew up with four different dogs, but the longest-lived only made it to 13. And during our 53 years of marriage Diane and I have also shared our lives with four dogs. Our current dog, Maddie, is actually quite spry for a canine who will be 14 in January. Because she is a Bichon Frise, she is genetically stubborn and a certified brat. That’s right, we should have suspected as much when we adopted her from a Bichon rescue group that called itself, “The Brat Pack.” Both we and the dog have, however, adjusted to this reality and come to a kind of understanding: Maddie obeys us when it suits her to do so. But she also offers great affection. We hope she stays with us for a few more years.

Maddie Sleeping As I Write

I’m not a PETA supporter because they believe and say some extremely stupid and very wrong things about people and animals. But I do enjoy all of God’s creatures, even the seemingly nasty ones, and believe we have an obligation to treat them humanely. God gave us responsibility for the creatures of the earth: 
“And God blessed them, and God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the air and over every living thing that moves upon the earth" [Gen 1:28].
Of course, based on recent news reports, Dr. Fauci seems to disagree with the humane treatment of animals. The sad news describes horribly cruel and deadly experiments on dogs which he apparently supported. I won’t repeat the details here, but you can read them at this link: Fauci’s Puppy Experiments. Almost as bad is a story out of the now openly totalitarian nation of Australia. It seems officials ordered that the dogs held at a dog pound had to be shot dead. Why? Because rescuers were due to pick up the dogs from the shelter and the officials were concerned that the rescuers might possibly have COVID. Here’s that link: Aussies Shoot the Dogs

These are just a couple of the problems that arise when governments decide to exert control over all aspects of the lives of citizens. Power misused begets cruelty, hatred, persecution of opponents, and usually death. Just consider the thousands of nursing home deaths in New York and other states caused by the thoughtless decisions of governors addicted to near absolute power.

God bless the earth and all its creatures, the young and the old, the wise and the not so wise.

Monday, July 25, 2011

A Changing, Odd World

Here are a few interesting facts about life today, including a few that certainly took me by surprise...

Higher Education. An increasing number of people are receiving master's degrees these days. According to Debra W. Stewart, president of the Council of Graduate Schools, nearly 2 in 25 people age 25 and over hold a master’s degree. This is about the same proportion that had a bachelor’s or higher in 1960. It would seem that grade creep has now expanded into degree creep, as a growing number of employers include an advanced degree among the qualifications for many jobs. Increased specialization has become the desired educational outcome, as students follow a path that begins in middle school and leads them all the way to graduate school. Along the way they receive plenty of job training, but the one thing they no longer receive is an education. To read more check out the NY Times article: The Master’s as the New Bachelor’s.

Fakirs are fakers. Oh, my, another bubble burst. All those yoga masters who for years have been generating all kinds of oohs and aahs with their levitations are actually phonies. Check out this video that's created quite a stir on YouTube:


How old is old? To all you folks who think you're going to live forever, here's some sobering news: Don't expect to live past 114, at the most, 115. Of the past nine people who have held the title of oldest human being all but one reached this milestone at the age of 114, and only two lived past the age of 114. The other two made it to 115 before entering eternity. To read more: The World's Deadliest Distinction.

Economic Freedom and Poverty. Among my favorite organizations is the Intercollegiate Studies Institute, which in their words "is a non-profit, non-partisan, tax-exempt educational organization whose purpose is to further in successive generations of college students a better understanding of the values and institutions that sustain a free and humane society." I especially like their books and journals, which are available online at very reasonable prices. And if you join ISI ($25 for us who are neither faculty or students) you get some very deep discounts. 

In their web journal, First Principles, ISI included an interesting video (see below) from EconomicFreedom.org. The video shows the connection between the degree of economic freedom a nation enjoys and the personal income of its citizens. While it's certainly true that the quality of a nation's economy and the standard of living of its people represent one of the more important elements of a free and just society, it is not the only element. Other freedoms -- religion, speech, press, association, etc. -- are just as important. 


Intercollegiate Sports. I'm not a big fan of intercollegiate athletics, and believe they have generally had a negative effect on the quality of education delivered by our colleges and universities. In most institutions the presence of intercollegiate athletics has led to the creation of two parallel but unequal educational programs, one for "scholarship" athletes involved in big-time (i.e., money-making) sports, and another for everyone else. Most of the arguments in support of intercollegiate athletics are easily countered with facts and common sense, but I suspect this will have no effect on their continued growth. 

Putting all this aside, however, I will descend from my soapbox. This all came about when a friend asked me the other day if I could identify the first intercollegiate sporting event in the United States. I could not, but I guessed anyway and suggested that it might have been a Harvard-Yale football game. Well, my friend didn't know either and had incorrectly assumed I would have this piece of trivia stored in some easily accessible brain cell. And so I was forced to do a little online research. It turns out that I was correct about one thing: it was a contest between Harvard and Yale. But I was wrong about the sport. It wasn't football, or baseball, or basketball, or any of the other big-time sports. It was a two-mile race between the crews of Harvard and Yale that took place on August 3, 1852 on Lake Winnipesaukee in New Hampshire. Now you know.

Dodgeball, an athletic oddity. The subject of dodgeball came up in the same conversation that generated the above question about the first US intercollegiate sporting event. That conversation quickly gravitated from football and baseball to grade school gym classes and the odd sports beloved by P.E. teachers. First on both of our lists was dodgeball. I played dodgeball a lot as a kid, but only in gym class. I never played in or even witnessed a game of dodgeball anywhere else. Back in those days, before the universal availability of organized sports -- e.g., Little League, Pop Warner, Youth Soccer, etc. -- the kids in my neighborhood would join up and head for the school playground or a vacant lot, divide into teams, and play touch football or baseball or whatever other sport happened to interest us at the time. But we never played dodgeball. I suspect we considered it a sport in which fast, little kids had a real advantage and most of us weren't fast and little. It was also boring. Of course, we believed the same about soccer which we considered a third-world sport not worthy of attention by real American boys. (I still feel this way.)

That's enough for now. Blessings...